Sophie Pike attended the BSC Conference in Nottingham last week and has kindly written a blog of her experience of the conference. Sophie presented a brilliant paper under the ‘Homicide Investigation’ panel – a widely tweeted about panel session! If you would like to contact Sophie about her PhD or research interests please email – Sophie.Pike@southwales.ac.uk or you can find her on twitter at Twitter at @MissSophie84.
Last week I attended the British Society of Criminology conference for the first time. It was a really informative event and this blog post will give an insight into my experiences of attending.
As well as attending the conference for the first time, I was asked to present as part of a panel that my PhD supervisor, Professor Fiona Brookman, established to address the topic homicide, which was entitled ‘Homicide Investigation: UK and USA Research Findings’. Dr Cheryl Allsop and I presented on our forthcoming paper ‘The Changing Face of Homicide Investigations – only the crime is fixed in time’. Based on our PhD research, the talk consisted of two parts. Firstly, I discussed some of my findings in respect of how the investigation of homicide in England and Wales has changed since the 1980s, before Cheryl explained how these changes, particularly scientific and technological changes, have enabled investigators to resolve cold cases many years after they originally occurred. I have always found it helpful to present my PhD research and have done so at several stages over the last few years; it helps to develop your ability to justify your topic and your approach along with your ability to answer questions about the research, all of which will be helpful when it comes to the Viva. It was great to speak to people afterwards and hear them say that they enjoyed the talk and are interested in my work – I even spoke to a prospective external examiner. Our panel was very well received and many people commented on how they liked and found useful that each of the three talks were linked to each other.
One of the things that I most enjoyed about the conference was the diversity of the talks – there were plenty to choose from and it was not easy to decide what to go along to! This was particularly the case with the postgraduate sessions on the first day. In the end I opted for the session on publishing in journals and books. It is my intention to convert my thesis into a book and there were plenty of helpful tips on how to do this. I found the hints around developing a book proposal especially helpful and I hope to put them to good use soon. As well as attending sessions that were more closely related to my research and areas of interest, such as the session on miscarriages of justice, I attended others that I was interested in, but knew less about. For example, I attended particularly interesting sessions on joint enterprise and animal abuse. It was helpful to learn about new topics and to see the very different ways in which people of all different experiences conduct their research and how they present that work.
My first experience of attending and presenting at the British Society of Criminology conference did not disappoint. It was, as ever, valuable, to present my own work and to learn more about areas that were new to me. The importance of networking also cannot be underestimated and it was great to meet new people (including those whose names I recognised from books and journals!) and to spend time with colleagues – heading to the pub to watch the football and chatting over several glasses of wine at the conference dinner! I would definitely recommend that other postgraduate students attend the conference if they get the chance.
Picture credit @BritSocCrim / Twitter